Home / Educativ / Codul de la Nurnberg în limba engleză

Codul de la Nurnberg în limba engleză

Carolina Gunderode
Incorect Politic
Octombrie 21, 2021

 
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448,

7 December 1996.

Introduction

The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to
which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in
a new code that is now accepted worldwide.


This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post
World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document
enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The
principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control
his own body.


This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected
benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.


This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.


The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended
into general codes of medical ethics.


The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical
experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably welldefined bounds,
conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the
practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such
experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other
methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must
be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:


1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This
means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent;
should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without
the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching,
or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient
knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved
as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This
latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision
by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature,
duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is
to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected;
and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his
participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests
upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is

a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with
impunity.


2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of
society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random
and unnecessary in nature.


3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal
experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other
problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the
experiment.


4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical
and mental suffering and injury.


5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to
believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those
experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.


6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the
humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.


7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to
protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury,
disability or death.


8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons.
The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of
the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.


9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to
bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state
where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.


10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared
to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe,
in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required
of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury,
disability, or death to the experimental subject.


For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):144575

3 comments

  1. Felicitari pentru expunere:

    NU UITATI CA EMINENTA AVOCATA DIANA SOSOACA, FLUTURA ACEST COD TOT TIMPUL IN NASUL INAMICULUI!

    SI NOI TREBUIE SA LUPTAM LA FEL !

    CACI TREBUIE SA LUPTAM CONTRA DUSMANULUI OPUNANDU-I CHIAR ARMELE CREATE DE EL !

    NU NE OPRESTE NIMENI SA ADAUGAM SI CODURILE JURISPRUDENTEI AUTENTIC EUROPENE .

    TREBUIE ATACAT CU TOATE ARMELE :

    DEODATA !

  2. EXPUS AZI DE CATRE EMINENTUL NOSTRU SPADASIN IN NUMELE ADEVARULUI ADEVARAT, PROF ION COJA :

    Criminalii din spitale?

    21 octombrie 2021|Amestecate
    caroline gunderode
    226 aprobate
    google.bex
    [email protected]
    109.133.42.42

    BEATRICE MAHLER FOLOSESTE REMDESIVIRUL DESPRE CARE SE STIE IN FRANTA CA ESTE INTERZIS DEOARECE ESTE LETAL: OMOARA RINICHII INIMA SI FICATUL SI NU VINDECA NIMIC . IN SCHIMB COSTA 3000 EURO TRATAMENTUL . ACEASTA UCIGASA DE ROMANI SARACI IA PARAINDARATUL 8
    IN PLUS ADAUGATI ZECILE DE MII LUATE DE SPITAL PTR FIECARE „MORT DE COVID” fals, caci AUTOPSIA ESTE INTERZISA INCA ! NU SE FACE , IN GENERAL !

    CALCULATI CE BANET A FACUT CRIMINALA ASTA SI TOATE CADRELE REMUNERATE SPECIAL PENTRU FIECARE CAZ FALS SAU AUTENTIC DE COVID !

    STAREA POLITICII CRIMINALE DIRIJEATA IN ROMANIA, CA PESTE TOT, DE GRADELE FANCMAC MAI MARI DE 33 GRADE SI DE RELEURILE LOR DE PESTE TOT :
    Urmează STARE DE URGENȚĂ? Pariurile avocatului Gheorghe Piperea
    Incorect Politic
    Octombrie 20, 2021

    Pariu: guvernul zero 2.0 trece lejer de parlament.
    Pasul 2 – stare de urgență aprobată de parlament.
    Pasul 3 – dublarea primei perioade, de 30 de zile, la 60 de zile de stare de urgență.

    Hoția, corupția și conflictele de interese, plus îmbogățiții de “război”, vor fi impenetrabil secretizate.
    Alte continente de averi fără just temei se vor aduna acolo unde sunt deja munți de bani făcuți pe nenorocirea oamenilor obișnuiți și terifiați.

    Bonus: să stai 60 de zile în casă în condițiile în care facturile la utilități s-au triplat înseamnă nu numai cădere psihologică masivă, ci și faliment economic și social. Nu numai băncile și colectorii de creanțe, ci și furnizorii de utilități vor executa silit și evacua debitorii din casele familiale.

    Nicio lege nu îi protejează, căci actuala putere nu a vrut să lase astfel de legi să treacă de parlament/ccr.

    PS Dacă nu trece Cioloș, trece Cîțu 2. Planul rămâne același. Deci, start la cumpărat drojdie și hârtie igienică.

    Nota redacției – Se pare că mulți bolnavi sunt declarați Covid în mod eronat sau fraudulos. Voi veni cu exemple.

    Distribuie!
    FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsApp

  3. Tehnic e corect, dar practic nu e. Degeaba mă duc eu la ANAF sau la oficiul poștal cu Codul de la Nurenberg în mâna, că tot n-o să pot să intru. La proști și la slujbașii cu simțul răspunderii ca ăia de aici
    https://www.incorectpolitic.com/oile-speriate-la-coada-pentru-serul-experimental/

    nu merge cu argumente inteligente.

    O soluție mai concretă ar fi?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *